The IriusRisk alternative built for agentic development.
If the ThreatModeler merger has you re-evaluating anyway, don't swap one diagram tool for another.
DevArmor keeps your architecture, policies and past decisions in one security brain, then enforces them in every design review, every pull request and every coding agent.
Re-evaluating after the merger?
Compare where each platform enforces security: in a report, or at the pull request before code merges.
.png)
No time to book a call? Watch the demo.
See how DevArmor integrates into your SDLC in under 4 minutes. Our CEO walks you through the product and shows exactly how it works, from design to code.
.png)
From static diagrams to enforced decisions.
Legacy threat modeling produces a diagram and a report, then the code moves on without it.
DevArmor turns approved design decisions into Policy-as-Code checks on every pull request and can block unsafe merges. The same context flows to developers and coding agents in GitHub, VS Code, Cursor and MCP.
Every review links back to the decision behind it, so your audit trail builds itself. We automate what they charge consultants to do.
DevArmor vs ThreatModeler/IriusRisk
ThreatModeler fits teams that want broad compliance reporting and a mature integration catalog.
DevArmor fits teams that need enforcement at the pull request and support for AI coding agents.
Continuous, not once a year
Most teams threat model once a year at best.
DevArmor re-evaluates as your architecture changes, so reviews keep pace with AI-speed delivery and your auditors see current evidence, not last year's diagram.
.png)